He hecho eso durante años pero ahora encuentro que los jpeg de cámara me gustan mucho más que los procesados por mí mismo. De todos modos la bibliografía sugiere que en algunas simulaciones el procesador de la cámara aplica efectos que no son reproducibles en procesado:
"The fine detail that ACROS achieves is only possible with the resolution power of 24MP. And the complex grain effect is only possible with the powerful X-Processor Pro engine. It may be possible that the same concept can be achieved without the two new devices, but can we say that to be “ACROS”? The answer is “No.” We would not release a quality that does not meet our standard.
We also think that it is very unlikely that any RAW conversion software would achieve what “ACROS” achieves. We all know that there are excellent RAW conversion software in the market, but we also believe that the magic of X-Processor Pro is not so easily solved"
The Newest Film Simulation "ACROS" | | FUJIFILM Digital Camera X Series & GFX – USA
Que sea verdad o no -o que de verdad se note la diferencia- ya es otra cosa.